HOCON Configuration Management with Kora¶
This guide introduces type-safe configuration with Kora and HOCON. It covers how configuration records are extracted from application.conf, how required and optional values are represented in Java
code, and how reusable config fragments can be injected into multiple components without duplicating the whole block. You will also see how environment variables and printed runtime output make
resolved configuration easy to inspect.
If you want to check your progress along the way, use the finished working example: Kora Java Config HOCON App.
If you want to check your progress along the way, use the finished working example: Kora Kotlin Config HOCON App.
What You'll Build¶
You'll build a small runnable Kora application that:
- binds
app.name,app.version, andapp.environmentthrough@ConfigSource - treats
APP_VERSIONas required andAPP_NAMEas an optional override - defines one reusable
LibConfigwithendpointandrequestTimeout - extracts that same
LibConfigforlib1andlib2 - reuses one shared HOCON object and overrides only one field for the second library
- prints all resolved values to
stdoutduring startup
What You'll Need¶
- JDK 17 or later
- Gradle 7+
- A text editor or IDE
- Completed Creating Your First Kora App guide
Prerequisites¶
Required: Complete Getting Started
This guide assumes you have completed Creating Your First Kora App and already have a runnable Kora project with the application plugin and a generated application graph.
If you haven't created that baseline yet, complete the getting started guide first, because this guide focuses on typed configuration rather than initial project setup.
Overview¶
Configuration is how runtime environments influence application behavior without changing code. Ports, credentials, feature switches, timeouts, and external service addresses should live outside compiled classes, but application code still needs a type-safe way to read them.
The main lesson is that configuration should be explicit at the application boundary. Components should not search environment variables or parse files by themselves; they should receive typed configuration from the graph.
HOCON and Type-Safe Extraction¶
Kora can read HOCON configuration and extract it into Java interfaces or records. Instead of passing raw strings and maps through the application, components receive typed configuration objects. This makes required values explicit and lets the compiler help with configuration usage.
This guide uses two complementary mapping styles:
@ConfigSource("app")maps one fixed config section to a type-safe dependency@ConfigValueExtractormaps a reusable config shape that can be extracted from different paths
Use @ConfigSource when a component needs one stable section of application configuration. Use @ConfigValueExtractor when the same structure appears in several places and you want one reusable
extractor.
Required and Optional Values¶
HOCON supports useful composition features:
- required environment substitution such as
${APP_VERSION} - optional environment substitution such as
${?APP_NAME} - object reuse such as
${common-lib}
These features let one configuration file stay readable while still adapting to local development, tests, and deployed environments.
Like the protobuf contract in gRPC or the cache contract in caching, a config type is a boundary contract. It says which runtime values the application expects and what shape those values must have.
Configuration as a Graph Dependency¶
In Kora, configuration is part of the dependency graph. A component can request a typed config object in its constructor just like it requests a repository or client. That makes configuration dependencies visible and testable. It also keeps configuration parsing at the boundary of the graph instead of scattered across application code.
The practical flow is:
- add the HOCON configuration module
- define a fixed application config source
- bind required and optional values
- define a reusable value extractor
- reuse one config shape for multiple library settings
- run the app and inspect resolved configuration
Dependencies¶
Add the HOCON module to your existing project and keep logging enabled so startup behavior is visible while you learn.
Update build.gradle:
Why this matters:
config-hoconenables HOCON file loading in the application graphlogging-logbackkeeps startup and troubleshooting visible while the app runs
Modules¶
Start with the smallest possible application graph that can load HOCON config and run a Kora application.
At this point we are not adding application-specific configuration yet. We are only preparing the graph so later steps can bind typed config and print resolved values.
Create src/main/java/ru/tinkoff/kora/guide/config/hocon/Application.java:
package ru.tinkoff.kora.guide.config.hocon;
import ru.tinkoff.kora.application.graph.KoraApplication;
import ru.tinkoff.kora.common.KoraApp;
import ru.tinkoff.kora.config.hocon.HoconConfigModule;
import ru.tinkoff.kora.logging.logback.LogbackModule;
@KoraApp
public interface Application extends
HoconConfigModule, // <----- Connected module
LogbackModule {
static void main(String[] args) {
KoraApplication.run(ApplicationGraph::graph);
}
}
Create src/main/kotlin/ru/tinkoff/kora/guide/config/hocon/Application.kt:
package ru.tinkoff.kora.guide.config.hocon
import ru.tinkoff.kora.application.graph.KoraApplication
import ru.tinkoff.kora.common.KoraApp
import ru.tinkoff.kora.config.hocon.HoconConfigModule
import ru.tinkoff.kora.logging.logback.LogbackModule
@KoraApp
interface Application :
HoconConfigModule, // <----- Connected module
LogbackModule
fun main() {
KoraApplication.run(ApplicationGraph::graph)
}
Why this matters:
HoconConfigModuleactivates HOCON-based configuration loadingLogbackModuleadds basic startup and troubleshooting logs- the graph stays minimal for now: it can start the application and read the config file
Typed sections are introduced gradually: first the application section, then a reusable library shape, and only after that the explicit mapping from libs.lib1 and libs.lib2 to two instances of the same type.
If you want more background on graph wiring and factories, see the Container documentation.
Application Configuration¶
Now introduce the first typed config contract: a stable application section named app.
This is the simplest and most common config pattern in Kora. Instead of reading keys manually, you declare the shape once and inject it wherever it is needed.
Create src/main/java/ru/tinkoff/kora/guide/config/hocon/AppConfig.java:
Why this matters:
@ConfigSource("app")makes theappsection a first-class dependency- the contract stays close to the code that consumes it
- refactoring config keys becomes safer because the structure is explicit in one place
Required Values¶
With AppConfig defined, we can now decide which values are mandatory and which can fall back to defaults.
Update src/main/resources/application.conf:
app {
name = "Task Management App"
name = ${?APP_NAME}
version = ${APP_VERSION}
environment = "development"
}
What this means:
version = ${APP_VERSION}is required, so startup fails ifAPP_VERSIONis missingname = ${?APP_NAME}is optional and only overrides the default when the variable existsenvironmentstays a normal static value because this guide does not need to vary it yet
This is an important HOCON pattern: make critical values fail fast, but keep cosmetic or environment-specific overrides optional.
For more on substitution rules and supported value types, see the Configuration documentation.
Library Configuration¶
Next, create a reusable config shape for one library.
Imagine that an abstract library needs two settings:
endpointrequestTimeout
Instead of keeping those as raw keys, define them once as a type.
Create src/main/java/ru/tinkoff/kora/guide/config/hocon/LibConfig.java:
Create src/main/kotlin/ru/tinkoff/kora/guide/config/hocon/LibConfig.kt:
Now that LibConfig exists, return to the application graph and show explicitly where the two library configs come from.
@ConfigValueExtractor generates an extractor for the LibConfig shape, and the graph methods choose concrete branches of the config file. This gives Kora two different instances of the same type: one for libs.lib1 and one for libs.lib2.
Update src/main/java/ru/tinkoff/kora/guide/config/hocon/Application.java:
package ru.tinkoff.kora.guide.config.hocon;
import ru.tinkoff.kora.application.graph.KoraApplication;
import ru.tinkoff.kora.common.KoraApp;
import ru.tinkoff.kora.common.Tag;
import ru.tinkoff.kora.config.common.Config;
import ru.tinkoff.kora.config.common.extractor.ConfigValueExtractor;
import ru.tinkoff.kora.config.hocon.HoconConfigModule;
import ru.tinkoff.kora.logging.logback.LogbackModule;
@KoraApp
public interface Application extends
HoconConfigModule, // <----- Connected module
LogbackModule {
final class Lib1Tag {
private Lib1Tag() {}
}
final class Lib2Tag {
private Lib2Tag() {}
}
@Tag(Lib1Tag.class)
default LibConfig lib1Config(Config config, ConfigValueExtractor<LibConfig> extractor) {
return extractor.extract(config.get("libs.lib1"));
}
@Tag(Lib2Tag.class)
default LibConfig lib2Config(Config config, ConfigValueExtractor<LibConfig> extractor) {
return extractor.extract(config.get("libs.lib2"));
}
static void main(String[] args) {
KoraApplication.run(ApplicationGraph::graph);
}
}
Update src/main/kotlin/ru/tinkoff/kora/guide/config/hocon/Application.kt:
package ru.tinkoff.kora.guide.config.hocon
import ru.tinkoff.kora.application.graph.KoraApplication
import ru.tinkoff.kora.common.KoraApp
import ru.tinkoff.kora.common.Tag
import ru.tinkoff.kora.config.common.Config
import ru.tinkoff.kora.config.common.extractor.ConfigValueExtractor
import ru.tinkoff.kora.config.hocon.HoconConfigModule
import ru.tinkoff.kora.logging.logback.LogbackModule
@KoraApp
interface Application :
HoconConfigModule, // <----- Connected module
LogbackModule {
class Lib1Tag private constructor()
class Lib2Tag private constructor()
@Tag(Lib1Tag::class)
fun lib1Config(config: Config, extractor: ConfigValueExtractor<LibConfig>): LibConfig {
return extractor.extract(config.get("libs.lib1"))
}
@Tag(Lib2Tag::class)
fun lib2Config(config: Config, extractor: ConfigValueExtractor<LibConfig>): LibConfig {
return extractor.extract(config.get("libs.lib2"))
}
}
fun main() {
KoraApplication.run(ApplicationGraph::graph)
}
What happens here:
Lib1TagandLib2Tagdistinguish twoLibConfiginstances in the graphconfig.get("libs.lib1")andconfig.get("libs.lib2")select different config branchesConfigValueExtractor<LibConfig>converts each branch into a typed object
Add the first library section to application.conf:
app {
name = "Task Management App"
name = ${?APP_NAME}
version = ${APP_VERSION}
environment = "development"
}
libs.lib1 {
endpoint = "https://integration.local/api"
requestTimeout = 5s
}
At this stage, LibConfig is only used for lib1. The application graph extracts it from libs.lib1, and Kora converts 5s directly into Duration.
Configuration file¶
Now suppose a second library needs exactly the same shape.
You could duplicate the whole config block, but HOCON gives you a better option: place the shared values in one object and reuse that object where needed.
Update application.conf again:
app {
name = "Task Management App"
name = ${?APP_NAME}
version = ${APP_VERSION}
environment = "development"
}
common-lib = {
endpoint = "https://integration.local/api"
requestTimeout = 5s
}
libs.lib1 = ${common-lib}
libs.lib2 = ${common-lib}
libs.lib2.endpoint = "https://integration-2.local/api"
What changed:
common-libnow stores the shared defaults oncelibs.lib1reuses the whole objectlibs.lib2also reuses the whole objectlibs.lib2.endpointoverrides only one field after reuse
This is the payoff of combining HOCON reuse with @ConfigValueExtractor: one config shape, multiple extracted instances, minimal duplication.
Resolved Values¶
The last step is to prove that everything was injected correctly.
Instead of adding an HTTP endpoint, this guide uses a small @Root component that prints all resolved values to standard output during startup. This mirrors the console-style validation used in the
dependency injection guide.
Create src/main/java/ru/tinkoff/kora/guide/config/hocon/ConfigRunner.java:
package ru.tinkoff.kora.guide.config.hocon;
import java.util.LinkedHashMap;
import java.util.Map;
import ru.tinkoff.kora.application.graph.Lifecycle;
import ru.tinkoff.kora.common.Component;
import ru.tinkoff.kora.common.Tag;
import ru.tinkoff.kora.common.annotation.Root;
@Root
@Component
public final class ConfigRunner implements Lifecycle {
private final AppConfig appConfig;
private final LibConfig lib1Config;
private final LibConfig lib2Config;
public ConfigRunner(
AppConfig appConfig,
@Tag(Application.Lib1Tag.class) LibConfig lib1Config,
@Tag(Application.Lib2Tag.class) LibConfig lib2Config
) {
this.appConfig = appConfig;
this.lib1Config = lib1Config;
this.lib2Config = lib2Config;
}
public Map<String, String> snapshot() {
Map<String, String> values = new LinkedHashMap<>();
values.put("name", this.appConfig.name());
values.put("version", this.appConfig.version());
values.put("environment", this.appConfig.environment());
values.put("lib1.endpoint", this.lib1Config.endpoint());
values.put("lib1.requestTimeout", this.lib1Config.requestTimeout().toString());
values.put("lib2.endpoint", this.lib2Config.endpoint());
values.put("lib2.requestTimeout", this.lib2Config.requestTimeout().toString());
return values;
}
@Override
public void init() {
System.out.println("Config guide start");
this.snapshot().forEach((key, value) -> System.out.println(key + "=" + value));
}
@Override
public void release() {
System.out.println("Application shutdown");
}
}
Create src/main/kotlin/ru/tinkoff/kora/guide/config/hocon/ConfigRunner.kt:
package ru.tinkoff.kora.guide.config.hocon
import ru.tinkoff.kora.application.graph.Lifecycle
import ru.tinkoff.kora.common.Component
import ru.tinkoff.kora.common.Tag
import ru.tinkoff.kora.common.annotation.Root
@Root
@Component
class ConfigRunner(
private val appConfig: AppConfig,
@Tag(Application.Lib1Tag::class) private val lib1Config: LibConfig,
@Tag(Application.Lib2Tag::class) private val lib2Config: LibConfig,
) : Lifecycle {
fun snapshot(): Map<String, String> {
return linkedMapOf(
"name" to appConfig.name(),
"version" to appConfig.version(),
"environment" to appConfig.environment(),
"lib1.endpoint" to lib1Config.endpoint(),
"lib1.requestTimeout" to lib1Config.requestTimeout().toString(),
"lib2.endpoint" to lib2Config.endpoint(),
"lib2.requestTimeout" to lib2Config.requestTimeout().toString(),
)
}
override fun init() {
println("Config guide start")
snapshot().forEach { (key, value) -> println("$key=$value") }
}
override fun release() {
println("Application shutdown")
}
}
Why this matters:
@Rootensures the runner is actually created when the application startsLifecyclegives you a natural place to print or validate injected valuessnapshot()keeps the runtime output and the tests aligned around one contract
Run Application¶
Use the standard guide flow:
In the runnable sample, run injects APP_VERSION from koraVersion in gradle.properties, so ordinary ./gradlew run works out of the box.
If you want to override the application name too, add APP_NAME before startup:
Application Output¶
When the application starts, it should print output similar to this:
Config guide start
name=Task Management App
version=1.0.0
environment=development
lib1.endpoint=https://integration.local/api
lib1.requestTimeout=PT5S
lib2.endpoint=https://integration-2.local/api
lib2.requestTimeout=PT5S
If you provide APP_NAME, the printed name= line should reflect the override.
Prod configuration¶
A common next step is to keep separate config files for different environments such as development, staging, or production.
For example, create src/main/resources/application-prod.conf:
This file reuses the base configuration from application.conf and overrides only the values that differ for production. That is a common HOCON pattern for environment-specific config.
You can run the application with that config by passing Kora's config.resource system property:
With that override in place, the startup output should print:
For more on file resolution and external config files, see the Configuration documentation.
Best Practices¶
- Use
@ConfigSourcefor stable application-level config that belongs to one well-known section. - Use
@ConfigValueExtractorwhen the same config shape is reused under multiple paths. - Keep required values explicit with
${VAR_NAME}and optional overrides explicit with${?VAR_NAME}. - Prefer object reuse plus small field overrides over copying large config blocks.
- Keep startup diagnostics simple while exploring configuration behavior;
System.out.println(...)is enough for learning flows.
Summary¶
You now have a working HOCON-based Kora application that binds configuration in two ways. AppConfig maps a stable app section, while LibConfig is extracted twice from two different paths with
different tags. HOCON reuse keeps the file compact, and one override changes only the second library endpoint.
Key Concepts¶
@ConfigSource:
- maps one fixed config section to a type-safe interface
- works well for application settings like
app.nameandapp.environment
Required vs Optional Values:
${APP_VERSION}is required and fails fast when missing${?APP_NAME}is optional and overrides the default only when present
@ConfigValueExtractor and Reuse:
- one config shape can be extracted from multiple paths
${common-lib}copies the full object into another path- a later assignment such as
libs.lib2.endpoint = ...overrides only one field
Troubleshooting¶
Application fails at startup with an unresolved substitution:
app.version = ${APP_VERSION} is mandatory. In the runnable sample, run provides it automatically from koraVersion. If you remove that Gradle wiring, you must set APP_VERSION before startup.
APP_NAME does not override the default name:
HOCON keeps the last assignment, so the optional override must come after the default:
Library config values are duplicated across sections:
Move the shared values into one object such as common-lib and reuse it through ${common-lib} instead of copying the full block into both libraries.
Build hangs or fails unexpectedly:
Stop Gradle daemons and retry:
AccessDeniedException in the Gradle cache on Windows:
If cached files are locked by another process, retry with a fresh session cache:
What's Next?¶
- YAML Configuration to see the same typed configuration model with a different file format.
- JSON Processing to make request and response DTOs explicit in the small application you already have.
- Build an HTTP Server after JSON, because that guide builds on JSON DTO mapping and turns the app into a fuller HTTP API.
- Learn Dependency Injection Basics if the generated graph and config factories still feel unclear.
Help¶
If you encounter issues:
- compare with Kora Java Config HOCON App and Kora Kotlin Config HOCON App
- check the Configuration documentation
- check the Container documentation
- read the HOCON specification